Public per-license pricing
sign2.me communicates pricing without consult-based packaging.
Comparisons
sign2.me vs Conga Sign
SIGN2.MESalesforce-first process
vs
CONGA SIGNSalesforce integration
Two solutions built for Salesforce. A decision about focus and simplicity.
Conga Sign is Salesforce-native and connects to Conga's CPQ, CLM and document automation ecosystem. The proposition is broad, but pricing is consultative and the best experience may depend on other Conga products. sign2.me stays focused on signing, with its own license and public pricing.
Conga Sign and sign2.me are both Salesforce-native. The difference shows up in price transparency and how much each depends on a broader suite.
Independent from the suite
A signing layer without requiring Composer, CPQ or CLM.
Ready authentication
Email, SMS and WhatsApp token in the published proposition.
Receita Federal validation
A feature published for the Brazilian context.
Envelope and signer Path
Status in the Salesforce record context.
COMPARISON HIGHLIGHTS
Public pricing
Conga Sign uses consult-based packaging; sign2.me communicates per-license pricing.
Independent from the suite
sign2.me is a signing layer without requiring Composer, CPQ or CLM alongside it.
Authentication differences
Availability of SMS, KBA and ID verification varies; sign2.me communicates token and Brazilian validation in Salesforce context.
Languages
Conga documents 29 languages including Portuguese; sign2.me documents 18 and keeps a more focused operation.
Criterionsign2.meConga Sign
Salesforce packageSingle, independent layerManaged package integrated with the Conga suite (Composer, CPQ, CLM)
Billing modelFixed price per license, with no envelope/transaction/document capNo public table; consult-based packaging and suite bundles
Signer authenticationEmail, SMS and WhatsApp token; Receita Federal validationSMS depends on enablement; KBA and ID/biometrics vary by offer and region
Languages18 languages29 documented languages including Portuguese; custom text may require its own translation
Multi-company and subdomainIncluded in the licenseWhite-label mentioned; native multi-company not technically confirmed in a public source
Brazil complianceReceita Federal data validationCompliance materials cite ESIGN Act and eIDAS; MP 2.200-2 was not found
Product scopeSigning as a Salesforce process stepPart of a broader document automation and contracts suite
Information about the other solution varies by configuration, contracted plan or available public documentation — we flag 'not publicly documented' where no official source was found.
Conga Sign can make more sense for operations already using Conga Composer, CPQ or CLM that want to consolidate signing in the same suite.
sign2.me makes more sense for teams that want an independent signing layer with public pricing and no need for the entire suite.
Frequently asked questions
Is sign2.me cheaper than Conga Sign?
sign2.me: Fixed price per license, with no envelope/transaction/document cap. Conga Sign: No public table; consult-based packaging and suite bundles
Does sign2.me integrate natively with Salesforce, unlike Conga Sign?
sign2.me: Single, independent layer. Conga Sign: Managed package integrated with the Conga suite (Composer, CPQ, CLM)
Why do teams choose sign2.me over Conga Sign?
sign2.me makes more sense for teams that want an independent signing layer with public pricing and no need for the entire suite.
sign2.me / Service agreementSalesforceOpportunity · Acme Ltda.Origin record Flow eventClosed Wonactive sign2.me / SentService agreementClient — ✓ Signed
Witness — Pending
Witness — Pending
WHAT CHANGES WITH SIGN2.ME?
See sign2.me in action Conga Sign speaks more languages and belongs to a broad suite. sign2.me makes a different choice: a signing layer with public pricing, independent from a larger document platform.